Corporations, LLCs, and Partnerships for Investors
The legal structure of a business entity determines how it is taxed, how it is governed, what rights its investors have, and how liability is allocated. Most public companies are C-corporations, but investors also encounter master limited partnerships, real estate investment trusts, limited liability companies, business development companies, and other structures that create materially different economic and governance relationships between the entity and its investors. Understanding these differences is not a legal formality. It affects after-tax returns, voting rights, liability exposure, and the ability to hold management accountable.
The choice of entity type is itself a governance decision. Management and founders select the structure that best serves their interests, which may or may not align with investor interests. A partnership structure that avoids corporate-level taxation benefits investors and sponsors equally. A dual-class corporation that gives founders disproportionate voting control benefits founders at investors' expense. Evaluating the entity structure is part of evaluating the governance.
C-Corporations
The C-corporation is the standard structure for large public companies. It is a separate legal entity that pays corporate income tax on its earnings. Shareholders pay tax again on dividends and capital gains, creating what is known as double taxation. The combined federal tax burden on corporate earnings distributed as dividends is approximately 39-40% (21% corporate rate plus approximately 20-24% individual rate on qualified dividends).
Despite the tax disadvantage, C-corporations dominate public markets for several reasons. They can have unlimited shareholders of any type (individuals, institutions, foreign investors). They can issue multiple classes of stock. They have well-developed governance frameworks supported by decades of state corporate law, particularly in Delaware. And their shares are freely tradeable without the partnership tax reporting complications that deter many investors from other structures.
Governance in C-corporations operates through the board of directors, elected by shareholders at annual meetings. Shareholders have the right to vote on director elections, fundamental transactions (mergers, sales of substantially all assets), and charter amendments. Fiduciary duties run from directors and officers to the corporation and its shareholders. Courts, particularly Delaware courts, have developed extensive case law defining the scope and application of these duties.
The key governance advantage of the C-corporation for investors is the accountability framework. Shareholders who believe the board has breached its fiduciary duties can bring derivative lawsuits on behalf of the corporation. Proxy contests allow shareholders to nominate alternative director candidates. Annual say-on-pay votes provide a regular mechanism for expressing views on compensation. These mechanisms are less robust in partnership and LLC structures.
S-Corporations
S-corporations are corporations that have elected pass-through tax treatment under Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. The entity does not pay corporate-level tax. Instead, income and losses pass through to shareholders and are taxed on their individual returns. This eliminates double taxation but imposes several restrictions: S-corps are limited to 100 shareholders, cannot have non-resident alien shareholders, cannot have more than one class of stock, and cannot be owned by other corporations or partnerships.
These restrictions effectively prevent S-corporations from being large public companies. However, investors occasionally encounter S-corps in the small-cap space or through investments in companies that later convert to C-corporation status in preparation for an IPO. The governance framework for S-corps is essentially the same as for C-corps: the entity is still a corporation under state law, with a board of directors, shareholder voting rights, and fiduciary duties.
The single-class-of-stock requirement is a notable governance feature. S-corps cannot issue preferred stock, dual-class common stock, or other securities with differing economic or voting rights. This structural constraint produces inherently more egalitarian governance than C-corporations allow.
Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)
LLCs combine the limited liability of a corporation with the pass-through taxation of a partnership. They are governed by an operating agreement rather than a corporate charter and bylaws. The operating agreement is a contract among the members that defines their rights, responsibilities, and economic arrangements, and it can be customized to a degree that corporate charters cannot.
This flexibility is both the strength and the governance risk of the LLC structure. Operating agreements can allocate economic benefits, voting rights, and management authority in any manner the parties agree to. There are no mandatory board requirements, no required annual meetings, and fewer default fiduciary duty protections than in the corporate context. In Delaware, the LLC Act allows the operating agreement to eliminate fiduciary duties entirely, replacing them with a contractual "implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing" that provides significantly less investor protection than the duty of loyalty and duty of care that apply to corporations.
Publicly traded LLCs are uncommon but not unknown. Some companies have adopted the LLC structure after going public or have gone public as LLCs. Investors in these entities should read the operating agreement carefully, particularly the provisions regarding fiduciary duties, distributions, voting rights, and the ability of the managing member to make decisions that affect minority investors.
Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs)
MLPs are publicly traded partnerships that combine pass-through taxation with public market liquidity. They are most common in the energy sector, particularly midstream infrastructure (pipelines, processing plants, storage facilities). MLPs issue limited partner (LP) units, which trade on stock exchanges like shares, and are managed by a general partner (GP), which makes all operating and financial decisions.
The governance structure of MLPs creates a fundamental tension between the general partner and the limited partners. The GP typically owns a small percentage of the LP units but controls all management decisions. Most MLP partnership agreements limit or eliminate the fiduciary duties that the GP owes to LP unit holders, replacing them with contractual standards that provide less protection. This means the GP can make decisions that benefit itself at the expense of limited partners as long as those decisions are permitted by the partnership agreement.
Incentive distribution rights (IDRs) are the most controversial feature of the traditional MLP structure. IDRs entitle the GP to an increasing share of incremental distributions as the total distribution exceeds specified thresholds. At the highest tier, the GP might receive 50% of every incremental dollar distributed, despite owning only 2% of the LP units. This structure creates a misalignment where the GP benefits disproportionately from distribution growth, incentivizing the GP to prioritize distribution increases (even through debt-funded growth) over long-term value creation. Many MLPs have eliminated IDRs through restructuring transactions, often converting to C-corporation status, partly in response to governance concerns.
Tax complexity is a practical consideration for MLP investors. LP unit holders receive a Schedule K-1 rather than a 1099 for tax reporting, which increases tax preparation complexity. Income from MLPs can create unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) for tax-exempt investors, potentially generating a tax liability within retirement accounts. These practical considerations can affect the after-tax attractiveness of the investment regardless of the MLP's operational performance.
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
REITs are corporations or trusts that meet specific requirements for investing in real estate and distributing income to shareholders. To qualify as a REIT, an entity must invest at least 75% of its assets in real estate, derive at least 75% of gross income from real estate, and distribute at least 90% of taxable income to shareholders annually. In return, the REIT does not pay corporate-level tax on distributed income.
The mandatory distribution requirement has governance implications. By forcing REITs to distribute most of their income, the requirement limits the amount of cash available for management to reinvest. This reduces the agency cost of free cash flow, the risk that management will waste cash on value-destroying projects. Managers who must return to the capital markets (through equity issuances or debt) to fund growth face market discipline that managers of cash-rich companies do not.
REIT governance otherwise resembles C-corporation governance. REITs structured as corporations have boards of directors, shareholder voting rights, and fiduciary duties. REITs structured as trusts have trustees and beneficiaries with analogous governance relationships. The key governance distinction from C-corps is the mandatory distribution, which constrains capital allocation discretion and creates a built-in shareholder-return mechanism.
Externally managed REITs present a specific governance concern. In this structure, the REIT's operations are managed by an external management company under a management agreement, rather than by employees of the REIT itself. The external manager earns fees based on assets under management, creating an incentive to grow the asset base regardless of returns. Conflicts of interest between the external manager and the REIT's shareholders are inherent in the structure, and the management agreement's terms (fee structure, termination provisions, performance benchmarks) are the primary governance documents to evaluate.
Business Development Companies (BDCs)
BDCs are publicly traded investment vehicles that lend to and invest in small and middle-market businesses. They are regulated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and, like REITs, must distribute at least 90% of taxable income to shareholders to maintain their tax status.
BDC governance shares the external-management risk of externally managed REITs. Many BDCs are managed by external investment advisors who earn base management fees (typically 1.5-2% of assets) plus incentive fees (typically 20% of income above a hurdle rate). The incentive fee structure can encourage the manager to take on riskier investments to generate higher income, because the manager captures 20% of the upside but does not bear a proportional share of the losses.
Internally managed BDCs, where the management team is employed directly by the BDC, generally provide better governance alignment because management compensation comes from the BDC's operating results rather than from a separate fee agreement.
Entity Structure as a Governance Screen
The entity type creates the governance framework within which all other governance factors operate. C-corporations provide the strongest default protections for minority investors, supported by decades of case law and regulatory requirements. Partnerships and LLCs provide the most flexibility for structuring economic arrangements but the weakest default investor protections. REITs and BDCs occupy a middle ground, with mandatory distribution requirements that constrain management discretion but fee structures (in externally managed vehicles) that can create conflicts.
For investors, the practical implication is that the governance analysis required for a partnership or LLC investment is more intensive than for a C-corporation investment, because the investor cannot rely on default legal protections and must instead evaluate the specific terms of the operating or partnership agreement. Reading these agreements is not optional. It is the only way to understand what rights the investment actually provides.
Put these principles into practice. Track fundamentals, build portfolios, and analyze stocks with AI-powered insights.
Start Free on GridOasis →